The BaitShop Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > FireArms, et cetera > Handguns, Pistols and SixGuns
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Charter Arms Pit Bull 9 Federal (rimmed)
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

This site is completely supported by donations; there are no corporate sponsors. We would be honoured if you would consider a small donation, to be used exclusively for forum expenses.



Thank you, from the BaitShop Boyz!

Charter Arms Pit Bull 9 Federal (rimmed)

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
klallen View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
** The RockChucker **

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2331
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote klallen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Charter Arms Pit Bull 9 Federal (rimmed)
    Posted: 23 June 2012 at 18:09
evening, all.

this oop revolver kinda sunk it's teeth into me some time back as i was surfing over the auctions on gunbroker.  there always seemed to be one or two available whenever i'd get on but most wanted more then i was will to spend on a charter arms revolver.

i'm not what you'd call a fan of the parabellum and don't own a semi-auto in the round so i can't really say why this rimmed twin got to me.  would imagine the oop nature of the revolver and the rareness of the ammo had everything to do with it.

anyway, was again surfing this morning and saw a gun shop looking to offload their pit bull for $289.  i bought it.  should have it in my hands end of next week sometime.

working on the ammo situation, now.  i'm negotiating with a gun shop in florida claiming they have 8 boxes of so of this rimmed ammo.  $89.95 per 50-count box.  i'm thinking of 3 boxes.  two to break down and use for my handloading fodder.  one to actually shoot.  another option     ...     it's claimed that .38s&w brass can be trimmed, sized and loaded with 9mm data.  last resort if i can't get the factory ammo delivered.

i'll get some pics up when it's here.  and throw another handload development project on the pile.  i was starting to run low on those anyway.  :rolleyes:

later.

 

 




Edited by klallen
A Big Mouth Don't Make A Big Man !!!



The Duke
Back to Top
deaddog View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
*AKA The Flying Gun*

Joined: 23 April 2004
Location: Svalbard
Status: Offline
Points: 991201
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote deaddog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2012 at 06:07
If I recall the reason they quit making the 9mm was because people
were blowing up their 100 year old break open 38 S&W's with the
rimmed ammo?
I would think you could go the other way with loading a trimmed 38
into the 9mm. I load the S&W and get solid .380 acp velocities with it.
It's a stronger S&W not an old H&R or something like that.

DD
Endeavor to persevere.
Back to Top
klallen View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
** The RockChucker **

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2331
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote klallen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2012 at 07:45

Originally posted by deaddog deaddog wrote:

If I recall the reason they quit making the 9mm was because people were blowing up their 100 year old break open 38 S&W's with the rimmed ammo?

afternoon, d d .  from everything i've read, i believe you're 100% correct about why the 9mm federal went bye-bye.  even with all the warnings out there when the cartridge was introduced and after, you just can't take the stupid outa people, sometimes.  can't kill the stupid, so the cartridge has to go, i guess.  lol.

gonna see how this deal for the factory ammo pans out.  it is good to know i've always got the .38s&w case as a back-up.

 

k

A Big Mouth Don't Make A Big Man !!!



The Duke
Back to Top
klallen View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
** The RockChucker **

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2331
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote klallen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30 June 2012 at 02:46

ok.  picked the revolver up yesterday.  here's what we have :





it is a small revolver.  smallest revolver i've ever owned.  feels like my hand's all folded up on itself when wrapped around the grip.  for comparison with the srh :



initial impressions.  it's a roughly put together revolver.  but for a sub-$300 choice, i really wasn't expecting much.  the cylinder does not fully index when slowly pulling the hammer back.  again, a common afflixtion of a cheap revolver.  but when used double action or pulling the hammer back with some authority, it does just fine.  it feels fine in the hand.  there is solid weight there, but because of the size, it has that "toy" feel to it.

i'm still working on my handloads.  my choice for starters, rather then the costly expense of factory loaded ammo, was to use some trimmed starline .38s&w cases, size with 9mm dies and load with 9mm data for a 124 gr xtp.  i had been told by several pit bull owners that the revolver had a lip machined into each chamber of the cylinder at the case oal of both the federal and the luger (.754") so that, if the desire was there, standard 9mm luger ammo would headspace properly on the mouth and could be shot without issue, except for the obvious fact that the cases would need to be tapped out individually, as the extractor star wouldn't have anything to grab using a rimmless cases.

when i went up to my brothers shop to pick up the revolver, we looked at several things.  first, we wanted to test this 9mm luger notion.  brother had some of his handloads and when we dropped one into a chamber, it fell several thousandths below the face of the cylinder.  it was obvious, the firing pin would never reach the primer.  no go on the 9mm luger idea.  thought this was strange, in contrast to reports i'd gotten.  earlier, i'd talked with a fello poster from another site about semi-rimmed .38super brass being used.  my reason for going with .38s&w first was because we had it on hand mostly, but with it's mean case length (.780"), it'd require marginally less trimming then if i used .38super cases (.900").  well, seeing what we did with the 9mm luger ammo "falling in", just so happens my brother had some of his handloads for his .38super at the shop, too.  we grabbed a cylinder load of these (5) and low'n behold, they dropped right in, up to the rim.  we poured them back out and brother did some more digging into the cylinder.  in his opinion, it looked like each chamber had been machined longer then what the revolver originally delivered with.  and by the quality of the work, appeared to have done so quickly and without much care for precision.  the chamber walls were rough.  something that i had seen before with my dan wesson .375supermag and something that basically eliminated the use of top end pressure handloads cause they'd simply get stuck in the grooves of the wall.  i'd assume i'd see a similar thing with this revolver.  brother asked if i wanted to test out the gun by shooting the super loads.  figured, what the heck.

first one fired fine.  pulled the hammer for the second.  everything indexed perfectly.  it fired fine but then locked everything up.  and inspecting the cylinder, i could see that the third shot had slipped down under the ejection star under the recoil.  went into the shop.  the firing pin was still partially in the primer indention it had made when fired and that's what was stopping the cycle of the cylinder or the opening up of it.  little tapping here and there and we got things opened up easy enough.  regarding the semi-rimmed case slipping under the star, it's simply a situation where the chambers are very loose.  to loose to allow the use of such a slight rim.  the considerably larger rim of the s&w cases will eliminate this from happening.  after examining the two fired super cases, you could see where the machining started, as the mouth of the cases appeared to slightly roll in on itself.  using the shorter s&w cases should eliminate any portion of the case mouth coming in contact with this poorly machined portion deeper down the cylinder.

of course, we're just guessing with the machining issue.  from what i've heard and read about other pit bulls and cases they're capable of accepting as they delivered from the factory, it appears as if something was done to this thing.

i'm not going to panic with this thing until i get myself some mid-pressure handloads put together with the s&w brass.  6.6 grs of blue dot is printed as a max load in my hornady for the 124 gr xtp.  i'll drop that down to 6 and see what happend.  i'm not in search of a max pressure handload with this thing.  at this point, consistent and reliable function while putting the bullet center of mass on a chest target at 7 - 10 yds would suffice.

more to come   ......................

 

 

k



Edited by klallen
A Big Mouth Don't Make A Big Man !!!



The Duke
Back to Top
klallen View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
** The RockChucker **

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2331
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote klallen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 July 2012 at 01:05

loaded up 10 rounds this morning.  i'm not looking for velocity readings right now.  i simply want to see if we've got something that'll provide some function and reliability.  we'll worry about specifics, after that.  here's what i settled on for an initial test handload :

i went with a 5.6 gr charge of blue dot to start things off.  it should be mild.  at least mild for a 9mm luger round.  we'll see in these cases.  printed max oal for the luger and federal is 1.169".  i really didn't want to, or need to seat that deep in this revolver, so i started with 1.180".  with less of the bullet in the case, i wanted to ensure these things would be held in place as this small revolver moved under recoil.  with no cannelure on these xtp's for any degree of a roll crimp, i used a slightly more aggressive taper crimp then i'd typically use when handloading for a semi-auto.  it's hardly detectable, but the case mouth just barely starts to roll inward.  this crimp consistently pushed the bullet forward .002", giving me a finished oal for all 10 cartridges of 1.182".

for cartridge comparison :

l - r (9mmFederal~9mmMak~.357Sig~.357/.10mmAuto~9mmWinMag~9mmFeder al)

all in all, the bullet looks pretty good.  mean, in fact.  or as mean as a little dinker cartridge can look, anyway.

i am concerned with the firing pin getting lodged in the indentation on the primer, as it did.  with zero experience with this revolver, i really don't know what's going on there.  if it's a fluke, one time thing.  or if there's a history of it doing so.  i hope the simple floating of the .38super case and it's undersized rim was the cause and the larger rim of these s&w cases will hold everything as they should under firing.  i just don't know.

heading up to the lake a little later today.  might try and get this test run shot up there.  depends on how crowded it is.

 

k



Edited by klallen
A Big Mouth Don't Make A Big Man !!!



The Duke
Back to Top
klallen View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
** The RockChucker **

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2331
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote klallen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01 July 2012 at 18:17
SUCCESS !!!

at least, to start with, anyway.

10 shots taken. 10 holes in target satisfying my accuracy goal at 10 ft (give or take).

a very light handload at 5.6 grs . unburnt powder. cases ejected with the lightest of pressure. zero problems with the firing pin locking up cylinders action.

found one of the xtp's in the hardpan. doesn't look like a stitch of expansion. cleaned it up when i got home and honestly, it looks like it could be seated again. need a smidge more velocity and something fairly sturdy to shoot into to promote some expansion, i'm guessing.

now, we'll bump things up to 6.0 grs and start working over the chrony. i'll get a shot or two into some h2o jugs to see if that'll promote some level of expansion, too.

going to bed tonight one relieved charter arms pit bull owner.



k
A Big Mouth Don't Make A Big Man !!!



The Duke
Back to Top
klallen View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
** The RockChucker **

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2331
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote klallen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 July 2012 at 03:15

got up to the range real early sunday morning to try and beat the heat. ran loads for this federal over the chrony for the 1st time.

from hornady's #5, 6.6 grs of blue dot was the max charge for their 124 gr xtp in the luger, averaging 1100 fps from a 4" barreled semi-auto. not really knowing how light i should be keeping things using this .38s&w brass, i started with 6.0, 6.2 and 6.4 grs for this session. i'd read good reports from handloaders using modern starline brass for this conversion so figured i'd try to match the luger charge and see what happened. here's how the chrony's eye read things :

6.0 grs averaged 751.4 fps
6.2 grs averaged 796.8 fps
6.4 grs averaged 818.8 fps

very mild. the cylinder full of spend cases extracted easily. primer pockets were tight as when virgin. and almost 300 fps off target velocity.

it would appear as though a couple things are at work here. 2" shorter barrel. difference in translation comparing revolver and semi-auto platforms. thinking along the lines of a more drastic working pressure loss with the rather large cylinder gap of the pit bull. my handload, too. the longer case with a longer bullet seating depth translate to a large powder capacity over what the standard 9mm federal or 9mm luger have.

another thing to consider     ...     maybe a move to a .357 xtp so i have a crimping groove to use.  may help in building pressure and evening out the velocity spreads i was seeing.?.?.?.?

i probably should be satisfied where i'm at with an accurate enough, reliable enough handload that's very comfortable to shoot and is very easy on this little oop revolver. but i still want to see where this cartridge could go performance wise using brass not intended for it, but apparently serving the purpose very well (at least, to this point). so, 6.6, 6.8 and 7.0 (??) grs is where i'm going next. hopefully the working pressures will really start to build as i fill up the powder column with these next strings.

more to come .............



Edited by klallen
A Big Mouth Don't Make A Big Man !!!



The Duke
Back to Top
deaddog View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
*AKA The Flying Gun*

Joined: 23 April 2004
Location: Svalbard
Status: Offline
Points: 991201
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote deaddog Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 July 2012 at 03:39
KA,

I use Blue Dot just not in 9mm or .38 S&W. My Alliant book show a
7.9 max with a 124 gr 9mm. You can double check on their website.

DD
Endeavor to persevere.
Back to Top
788Fan View Drop Down
.30/06 SpringField
.30/06 SpringField


Joined: 10 August 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 336
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 788Fan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 July 2012 at 08:02
Korey, be careful trying to use a .357 head in the pitbull.  9mm tends to run .355.  Good luck.  788
"We are just an advanced breed of monkeys on a minor planet of a very average star. But we can understand the universe. That makes us something very special." Stephen Hawking 1942-2018
Back to Top
klallen View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
** The RockChucker **

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2331
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote klallen Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 September 2012 at 02:34

still with the 124 gr. .355 xtp :

6.8 grs averaged 923.0 fps
7.0 grs averaged 961.6 fps

a ways to go with this one. pressures are taking a more powder then printed data.  reasonable considering gap and longer oal. the revolver continues to be an accurate little thing. i'm starting to see a greater velocity increase per .2 gr powder increase so working pressures are starting to get there.

gonna skip a level     ...     next up, 7.2, 7.4 and 7.6 gr increments. if i can at least maintain that 40 fps increase per increment, somewhere within these groups should sneak me into that 1100 fps target velocity.

so far so good, though.

more to come ..................

A Big Mouth Don't Make A Big Man !!!



The Duke
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 September 2012 at 05:01

Federal dropped the 9mm rimmed because no one was making a revolver for it.  It has no advantage over the 38 special, and is not it's equal.  Charter Arms quit making it because they went bankrupt, and reinvented realized no one saw any need for the 9mm federal rimmed.

A slight advantage would be to use a shorter cylinder with the 9 federal, but the Charter is just the 38 cyclinder with a 9mm chamber, so it actually weighs just slightly heavier than the 38 special.  The only time the 9mm looks close to the 38+ is when the 9mm is used in a closed breach (aka auto) and the 38 is in a revolver with the velocity drop due to the cylinder gap.

Korey, I'd be interested in the barrel diameter, if you check it.  I strongly suspect that Charter (being in poor economic health) probably just used the 38/357 barrel,, not the smaller 9/355 barrel.  This larger bore might even have helped reduce over pressures, when someone loaded other 38 rounds/bullet in it????

40 years ago I bought a 38 spl Charter arms snubbie.  After 20 years the sequencing broke down.  Charter Arms rebuilt it free and it is still working good.  It is one of my son's CCWs.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.089 seconds.