ok, this rifle is not brand new... i bought it new back in may? i think, but time has been really limited, so i haven't had a chance to really put it thru its paces...
anyway, the equipment list:
rem 700 vls in 308 (26" heavy barrel, blue, laminated stock). i bedded the rifle and floated the barrel. the base is a one-piece 20 moa ken farrel, also bedded. rings are by warne (lows) and the scope is a swift 6-24x50. the rifle is also sporting a tubb titanium firing pin.
i just wrapped up range work this morning w/ this rifle, doing load development, testing the scope, and evaluating the firing pin's accuracy.
the firing pin: the claim is that it makes your rifle more accurate, and reduces lock-time. the lock-time claim is why i decided to buy it. w/o sophisticated timing devices i have no way of proving if lock-time has been reduced. it sure feels like it has been, but i have no proof other than 'feel'.
----- as far as accuracy goes, i think the pin has helped a little here, too, but not much. the bad thing is, i suspect that this pin is responsible for flyers. before the pin went in, i was getting around .8-.9" for 5 shots at 200 yards. now i am getting around .5-.6" at 200 for 5 shots. i managed 2 groups today that went .3 - but i am also getting flyers now that will open some groups up to the 2" range. i need to do a little more chasing before i know for sure what is causing these flyers, but that is my theory.
the base: this thing is really heavy. far and away the heaviest base i have felt (and this includes badger and nightforce), and that is saying something. it also sits high enough on the rifle that my 50mm objective scope w/ paralax adj on the outside clears the barrel in low rings (and actually looks quite nice).
the rings: i really like warne rings. but they are quite heavy, so i don't put them on weight-sensitive rifles (read: big game hunting rifles). they do great on my varminters and walking varminters, though.
the scope: swift 6-24x50 ao. the resolution on it is pretty good, but usable magnification stops at 20x. beyond that the image is so blurred that it begins to give me a headache. i was able to resolve 257 caliber bullet holes at 200 yards - the 308 holes were pretty easy. the other rifle i had out today (25-06) was wearing a leupold vari x-2. it could resolve the 308 holes, but couldn't really spot the 257's (about what you'd expect w/ half the magnification).
----- the ao on the swift is useless. i was shooting at 200 yards, so i set it for 200 and expected to fine tune it a little to make it right... not the way it worked in practice. the scope was so blurry w/ all settings that it was useless. once i had it cranked to infinity, i was able to use it. the swift scope is holding zero nicely, and the turrets (1/4 moa) adjust pretty close to 1/4 moa.
the rifle itself is very accurate, and is doing quite well w/ varget powder. the groups stay small across the spectrum of charge weights i tested, with the velocity just going up w/ heavier charges. the only other powder i tested was rl-15, and it did pretty good, but the velocities weren't quite as uniform as the varget was, sooo i picked up an 8lb can of varget (matching lot, of course). (one of the groups i fired today had a sd of 4 - u-n-i-f-o-r-m.
battery was dead in the digicam, and i forgot to charge the spares, so no pics. if somebody really wants pics, i can post them, otherwise we'll go w/o and have a thread that loads a little faster.
i'm leaving bright and early in the morning for a dog shoot. will be back saturday morning sometime, so i'll have a more complete test of the optics in by then. i am actually not looking forward to doing a lot of shooting thru this scope... while doing development work, it was giving me a little eye-strain. i imagine that by the end of the first day of shooting i'll have 'scope-eye' and will really limit my time behind this rifle. hope not, but we'll see.
gotta go gear-up for dogs!
Edited by dakotasin