The BaitShop Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > FireArms, et cetera > Handguns, Pistols and SixGuns
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 500 S&W test results
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

This site is completely supported by donations; there are no corporate sponsors. We would be honoured if you would consider a small donation, to be used exclusively for forum expenses.



Thank you, from the BaitShop Boyz!

Topic Closed500 S&W test results

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Fiftydriver View Drop Down
.243 Winchester
.243 Winchester
Avatar

Joined: 06 April 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 189
Direct Link To This Post Topic: 500 S&W test results
    Posted: 26 April 2004 at 11:01

To all interested,

A customer came in the shop yesterday wanting me to do some custom loading for his brand new 500 S&W.  I was unable to get started until today but really hit her hard.

The customer has a large surplus of W-296 so this is the powder he decided he wanted to use in the loads which is a pretty good match for this round.

I recommended the 440 gr WFNGC from Cast Performance since they have worked so well fo me in my T/C Encore in 50 A.E.

Here are the load specs that were tested:

-Starline case, once fired

-Fed-210 primers

-2.005" oal

-crimped with a heavy but not overly aggressive crimp.

I test the revolver loads, at least the open sighted revolver loads at 35 yards, a revolver with a scope is tested at 50 yards.  I feel 35 yards is a better test distance then the standard 25 yards because it gives a more accurate review of a load and it also allows the open sights to be tested a little harder then at 25 yards while still being close enough for good accurate group shooting.

Here are the chronograph results along with group size(3-5 shot group ave):

34.0gr      Ave:  1474 fps     E.S.:   56 fps    Group ave. ctc:  2.015"

35.0gr      Ave:  1509 fps     E.S.:   20 fps    Group Ave ctc:  1.838"

36.0gr      Ave:  1539 fps     E.S.:   45 fps    Group Ave ctc:  1.564"

37.0gr      Ave:  1585 fps     E.S.:   26 fps    Group Ave ctc:  2.085"

This is where I stopped.  Not because of pressure signs but mainly due to hand fatigue.  I am sure that this revolver could easily be loaded up to the 1700 fps level with these 440 gr bullets and if the owner wants that then we will but personally, that bullet at near 1600 fps is plenty enough for all handgun hunting anywhere.  More recoil just adds to the difficulty in accurate shooting.

As far as the gun goes, its the 8 3/8" model with muzzle compensater, it is a nice handgun, finished very nicely but for the money, it had better be.  There is one problem with the clock work of the gun and tht is that the hand will not "walk" when the trigger is pulled hard to the right.

"Walking" is when you pull the trigger just enough so tht the cylinder will free wheel.  The clicking noise you hear is the hand "walking."  It must do this or there can be indexing problems if the trigger is pulled hard and quick.

In this case, it is exceptionally bad because any right hand shooter using this revolver in a state of excitement, such as being nibbled on by a big critter would create a situation that may result in the cylinder not rotating if the trigger is pulled quickly.

Accuracy wise, I own several and have seen many dozens of single action Ruger Blackhawk revolvers that would put this load to shame as far as accuracy goes.  At 35 yards, I like to get near 1" groups for my customers and as of yet, with this load it does not appear it will do it. The 36.0 gr load produced a respectable 1.5" average which for a revolver of this power class is pretty good.

One other problem was that the sights were not able to be adjusted low enough for these loads.  With the rear sight bottomed out, groups are still printing nearly 4" high at 35 yards.  This is no doubt to the heavy bullet but I feel since this bullet weight is one of the stardard factory load weights, the revolver should have the adjustment to zero such a load.

The grips are Hogue and are very soft and sticky, almost to sticky as I was loosing some layers of skin by the time the end of the testing came.  As with most S&W grips, even though the back strap is covered, there is very little cushion to protect the web of your hand.

As far as the conpensator goes, its a good and bad thing in my mind when it comes to handguns.  First off, a compensator is designed to do one thing, reduce muzzle jump.  It does alright at this but muzzle jump is still similiar to my heavy loaded 480 Ruger with 425 gr pills.  Without the comp though, I would imagine this revolver would jump much harder and quicker.

Personally, I feel a revolver rising up in recoil, uses up alot of the felt recoil energy, with a compensated revolver, everything comes straight back into the web of your hand.  I feel they are very poor recoil reducers even on big bore revolvers.

My personal opinion of the revolver is that its very powerful, heavier then one ultra light rifles, far to long to carry comfortably and only resonably accurate(although this is only one series of loads tested).

For my money and for what this handgun would be designed to be used for, I would feel better with my Ruger SRH in 480 Ruger loaded with its 425 gr hard cast driven to 1175 fps.  Its lighter, shorter, much more accurate and has plenty of power for any North American big game hunting.

Is the 500 a good round?  You bet, if shooters can handle the thing.  Recoil is not that punishing but a shooter will need to condition themselves to stop the momentum of the +70 oz revolver which flat out tired my hand out by the time the testing was over and I shoot a fair amount of big bore handguns.

For an open sighted revolver that will be used at 125 yards or less, I feel there are much better ballanced rounds and for a back up revolver that is carried all the tiem and used very little, the big 500 is basically worthless as no one I know will be willing to carry its weight. 

I hear S&W are bringing out a 4" version that only weights "56 oz!!"  at least that is getting down to the SRH weight which is still far to heavy for a pack gun.

I was curious as to why S&W made the cylinder so long?  There is no need, even with the 440 gr WFNGC's loaded to an oal of 2.005", there is still nearly .5" of unused throat in the cyinder.  Perhaps it was more for impressive looks then anything.  A shorter throat would do nothing but help accuracy and also cut off several oz. of weight.

Anyway, its a quality revolver, but from what I have seen, it is over priced as far as accuracy goes.

Just my opinion.  I will check with the customer and see if he wants to go higher with his loads, I feel he will until he shoots the 36 and 37 gr loads.

What are your opinions of the 500, practical opinions from those that have shoot the revolver!

Good Shooting!!!

50 

Back to Top
deaddog View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
*AKA The Flying Gun*

Joined: 23 April 2004
Location: Svalbard
Status: Offline
Points: 991201
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 April 2004 at 14:40
I haven't shot mine since Nov. I think it broke a bone in my hand. I loaded up 42 gr. of LIL GUN with 465gr. Lead Head bullets. The average velocity was 1690 fps. I have about sixty rounds left that I want to pull the bullets and reduce the load but they are too big to fit into my RCBS puller, also I put an evil crimp on them so I'm going to have a heck of a time getting the out. I was getting 3 1/2" inch groups at 100 yds. I missed a doe with it at 165 paces last fall. I hit high just above her back and blew a 3" dia branch off the tree just above her, it landed on her back you should have seen her run. The factory loads are a non event .44 mag in nature but those hand loads turn it into a monster!
Back to Top
dakotasin View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
a TRUE brother-in-arms!

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4099
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 April 2004 at 15:12

i sure don't own one, but have touched one off a couple of times...

my opinion is a reflection of yours, more or less. i'm happy that s&w is into load research and such, and i'm happy that they are still pushing out quality.

but... the x-frame smith is entirely uninteresting to me. i'd much rather have a rifle (and the accuracy that went w/ it) and save a couple ounces, than to lug that beast around.

i just shot factory loads, so i have no comment on handloading for the beastie.

i wonder, though... is there a better way to house the 500 s&w? i mean, the x-frame is god-awful huge, and extraordinarily heavy... is it possible to produce a 5-shot revolver on a super red hawk platform and have a weight and size that is a little more reasonable? yeah, i know, recoil will be harsh... but, i'd be more likely to buy one if i could get it in a size and weight that was palatable, and then worry about the recoil, rather than taking a pre-emptive stance on recoil... know what i mean?

it is a nice gun, but i wouldn't hunt w/ it... or carry it for back up for that matter.

Hunting is not a matter of life or death; it is much more important than that.
Back to Top
deaddog View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
*AKA The Flying Gun*

Joined: 23 April 2004
Location: Svalbard
Status: Offline
Points: 991201
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 April 2004 at 15:27
I've read that they're thinking about a 4" barrel. I can't imagine being able to hold on to that flame thrower without launching it. They are also looking at chambering it in .22-250. That probably wouldn't kick so bad.
Back to Top
klallen View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
** The RockChucker **

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2331
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 April 2004 at 15:29

"is there a better way to house the 500 s&w?"

From the report, I'm wondering if this cartridge isn't almost getting to that point where it's just to large for practical use in any revolver.?.?.?.?  It's gonna be plain ole brutal loaded to MAX, even in that heavy, 8 3/8" model.  Go lighter in weight to make it easier for packing purposes, and who know's if it would even be safe for the shooter.  'Specially those 440's at 1650 - 1700 fps.  Be the pits to own the cartridge and down load it just so it can be shot.

Might be a cartridge well suited for a lever action of one kind or another.  Seems like it's kinda trendy now-a-days having revolver cartridges in lever guns.  Probably get a lever gun for a heck of a lot cheaper then the S&W X-frame too, and increase the performance of the cartridge with the longer barrel.  Hmmmm.  Maybe a 94AE.?.?.?.?  Sounds kinda interesting.  Let's see who does it first.

While I enjoyed shooting the light factory loads in the S&W, the cost of the thing makes it an impracticality for me right now.  >>  klallen



Edited by klallen
A Big Mouth Don't Make A Big Man !!!



The Duke
Back to Top
deaddog View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
*AKA The Flying Gun*

Joined: 23 April 2004
Location: Svalbard
Status: Offline
Points: 991201
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 April 2004 at 15:44

It would be a real zinger in a lever action. I'm getting nearly the same velocity with the 465gr .50's out of a 8 3/8" barrel as I do with 405gr 45-70's out of my Marlin Guide gun with 18". 

Back to Top
Moose6 View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
AKA The Knoxville NASCAR Nut

Joined: 25 July 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2191
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 April 2004 at 01:24
Does it come with sling swivel studs and a shoulder strap?
Y'all shoot straight!!!

Moose - Knoxville, TN
Back to Top
deaddog View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
*AKA The Flying Gun*

Joined: 23 April 2004
Location: Svalbard
Status: Offline
Points: 991201
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 April 2004 at 02:06
Mine doesn't but the one from the S&W Performance Center does. It also has a l10 1/2" barrel and a built in scope rail. Called the "Hunter". Should be called the boat anchor.
Back to Top
macca View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
AKA The Thunder From DownUnder

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1149
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27 April 2004 at 20:28

We will never see one down under with our new laws,so I can only drool in envy.I used to love the 44mag and though it had some power but the 50 sounds a arm killer.

A 4 inch barrel would take some controlling.Maybe I'm glad I won't get to fire one.

Macca

don't let the bastards grind you down.

Back to Top
deaddog View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
*AKA The Flying Gun*

Joined: 23 April 2004
Location: Svalbard
Status: Offline
Points: 991201
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04 May 2004 at 18:22
A buddy of mine was over the other day I asked him If he wanted to shoot it. He was a little wary since the last time he was over he ended up with a nice half circle scar on his eyebrow from a light .54 Black powder I had loaded with 3- 60gr Pyrodex pellets. It has a 3X9 scope which I told him three times to turn down to 3X, well he didn't listen. The other day he knowing that whatever I have must hurt, put on apair of leather gloves. I handed him some cotton for padding on his palm. After touching it off and seeing the grimace on his face I asked him what the problem was. He indicated that the triggerguard had come back and wrapped the middle finger of his shooting hand. The swelling confirmed this to be true. Every time he comes over he gets hurt in some way or another. I'm going to have a hard time comming up with another gun to meet the challenge...
Back to Top
Moose6 View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
AKA The Knoxville NASCAR Nut

Joined: 25 July 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2191
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 May 2004 at 01:08
Hey deaddog, I can help you out.  I have access to a 12 gauge single shot that is very light yet shoots 3" shells.  I shot it once... ONCE.... and had a bruise on my shoulder for 2 days.  Let me know if you want to borrow it and I'll send it to ya'.  This ought to hurt your friend pretty good.  With friends like deaddog, who needs any enemys .
Y'all shoot straight!!!

Moose - Knoxville, TN
Back to Top
deaddog View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
*AKA The Flying Gun*

Joined: 23 April 2004
Location: Svalbard
Status: Offline
Points: 991201
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05 May 2004 at 02:55
I feel I've done my friendly duty by warning them first. Some catch on and respectfully decline some have an innate need for a dose of pain.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.