The BaitShop Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Hunting > Big Game
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Minimum Catridge for Big Game
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

This site is completely supported by donations; there are no corporate sponsors. We would be honoured if you would consider a small donation, to be used exclusively for forum expenses.



Thank you, from the BaitShop Boyz!

Topic ClosedMinimum Catridge for Big Game

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
Rob1 View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
** The Walnut Whisperer **

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: Vatican City State
Status: Offline
Points: 3413
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Minimum Catridge for Big Game
    Posted: 23 June 2003 at 14:11
 The last I checked Mt. had no minimim requirement. What say you for a deer rifle and why.
Back to Top
TasunkaWitko View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
aka The Gipper

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: Chinook Montana
Status: Offline
Points: 14753
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 June 2003 at 14:14

if i was writing a "minimum cartridge" law for montana, the .257 caliber would be my pick for a minimum, because i have heard of SOME bad experiences with the .243 (albiet not many), but i have never heard of a failure in a .257.

my own minimum would actually be a bit bigger, the .264/6.5 caliber

TasunkaWitko - Chinook, Montana

Helfen, Wehren, Heilen
Die Wahrheit wird euch frei machen
Back to Top
dakotasin View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
a TRUE brother-in-arms!

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4099
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 June 2003 at 15:45

i never did understand the fascination of shooters to use the absolute minimum cartridge that was legal. my philosophy is to use the largest cartridge that a hunter can comfortably shoot and is proficient with.

my personal minimum for deer is 257 caliber. i wish the legal minimum would also be 257, but would get over it ok enough if it were 243... however, s.d.'s 22 caliber centerfire is just not enough...

Hunting is not a matter of life or death; it is much more important than that.
Back to Top
Triggerguard View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby

aka The San Antonio Terminator

Joined: 13 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2212
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 June 2003 at 16:56
Texas law states "not a rimfire cartridge". .22 Hornet is a legal
cartridge for whitetails here. Stupid, maybe, but legal...
"...A moral compass needs a butt end.Whatever direction France is pointing-towards collaboration with Nazis, accomodation with communists,...we can go the other way with a quiet conscience"-O'Rourke
Back to Top
Rob1 View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
** The Walnut Whisperer **

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: Vatican City State
Status: Offline
Points: 3413
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 June 2003 at 17:15
I think that a argument could be made that a .223, 22-250. 220Swift are all very capable with a proper bullet (read non-varmint). May be stretching things but I'd bet I could harvest deer cleanly with a .22 hornet as well.
Back to Top
dakotasin View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
a TRUE brother-in-arms!

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4099
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 June 2003 at 18:16

yeah, i have no doubt you could, as could many (most? all?) serious rifle cranks. but, my argument is why? why use a 22-250 when the rifle costs the same as the same rifle chambered to 308? the 22-250 might handle the task ok, but the 308 will handle the task. and it is a rare hunter that cannot handle the 308. if not the 308, then 257 rob, 243, whatever...

Hunting is not a matter of life or death; it is much more important than that.
Back to Top
macca View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
AKA The Thunder From DownUnder

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1149
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 June 2003 at 21:18
Down under we usually have the 270 as the minium limit for large deer like sambar..I think 6mm is the minium for the others.I usually go up caliber.I think the 257 is a good caliber but don"t use much under 6.5mm for deer.Dakotasin makes the valid point why use the light end when the more suited cals are there.Have a good one macca.
don't let the bastards grind you down.

Back to Top
Triggerguard View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby

aka The San Antonio Terminator

Joined: 13 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2212
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2003 at 01:48

Originally posted by Rob1 Rob1 wrote:

I think that a argument could be made that a .223, 22-250. 220Swift are all very capable with a proper bullet (read non-varmint). May be stretching things but I'd bet I could harvest deer cleanly with a .22 hornet as well.

Of course you can. The question is, can you do it consistently? My wife's grandfather killed more deer than I ever will with a single shot Mossberg .22 RF.His rifle was with him always, and he didn't take shots he knew he shouldn't take. He saw dozens of deer each day. How many have the opportunities to do that? How many will limit their shots to effective range?

"...A moral compass needs a butt end.Whatever direction France is pointing-towards collaboration with Nazis, accomodation with communists,...we can go the other way with a quiet conscience"-O'Rourke
Back to Top
Rob1 View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
** The Walnut Whisperer **

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: Vatican City State
Status: Offline
Points: 3413
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2003 at 02:25
 There is a stigma attached to the use of small caliber arms for big game. I'm trying to fiqure it out. I see on one hand people justifing long range hunting and some of those same people think a .223 is a little small. I would think the arguement for/against small arms and long range would similiar.
Back to Top
pocketnavy View Drop Down
.375 Holland & Holland Magnum
.375 Holland & Holland Magnum


Joined: 12 June 2003
Location: Antarctica
Status: Offline
Points: 612
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2003 at 04:51

Hmmm . . . not sure caliber should be the main criteria.

Knew a guy one time who was a professional wookie hunter.  He was up in Minnesota, or some place, and he was using a .240 Weatherby Mag.  Shot a wookie in the butt and blew his left cheek completely off!      Dang fur flew everywhere!  Last he heard, that wookie had left the State and was out West somewhere, sitting in a bar on one of those foam rubber rings and nursing his pain and moaning over a glass of Moose Drool. 

More seriously, we didn't have to worry about all this until the Army dreamed up the M1 carbine and left thousands of them floating around the country.  More guys were chasing wounded deer around the hunting fields than I care to think about.  So came minimum lengths, calibers, and on and on.

Frankly, I think the minimum caliber should be 6mm.  I wouldn't be afraid to take a .240 Weatherby Mag into ANY hunting area.  The .243, despite being called a "girl's gun" by at least one person, has accounted for more than a few deer.  On the other hand I hunted whitetails in Texas with a Mini-14.  The .223 is quite effective against SMALL deer.  Texans have proved it thousands of time.  But . . . some States, like West Virginia have a 25 caliber minimum.

As much as I hate Federal regulations, I think a .243 minimum would be acceptable - as long as energy figures etc. were adequate.  A 6mm Remington makes a fine whitetail cartridge - although I would opt for a .240 Wby Mag or a .257 Roberts or .25-06 for deer.



Edited by pocketnavy
Back to Top
klallen View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
** The RockChucker **

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2331
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2003 at 08:59

I think the .22-250 works beautifully on deer.  On the light end?  Certainly.  But it sure does get the job done.  I started out with the old mans .22-250 varminting back before it was legal for me to hunt big game, then shot it the first 4 years of my deer hunting, exclusively.  Got my own after that and mixed its use with a .30-30 for the next while.  Seemed to work well.  Dad still uses the same rifle to this day to fill his deer tags.  It just keeps working. 

Anyway, .22-250 is the smallest I've gone on deer.  Can't imagine that the .223 wouldn't work but I've not put it to the test like the 250.  Later.  >>  klallen

Back to Top
TasunkaWitko View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
aka The Gipper

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: Chinook Montana
Status: Offline
Points: 14753
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2003 at 09:22

korey -

first, we find out that you have a .30/06!

now this!!!!!!>>>after that and mixed its use with a .30-30 for the next while

all i want to know is:

who the hell are you and what did you do with the REAL klallen????

TasunkaWitko - Chinook, Montana

Helfen, Wehren, Heilen
Die Wahrheit wird euch frei machen
Back to Top
klallen View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
** The RockChucker **

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2331
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2003 at 09:41
Ahhhhh, come on Ron  >>  You know me.  Same old klallen.  Love the big, hard hitting stuff, but I can't deny what works.  Someone asked me a long time ago over on Shooters (when it came out that I started with the .22-250 and was having nice success with it) why I'd move to the .300 WinMag, STW, Warbird.  Stuff like that.  Cause I wanted to.  I've alway said I never moved from the .22-250 cause it failed me in any way.  I moved simply cause I wanted to try different things.  Change in hunting location had something to do with it as well.  Moving from under 200 yd. river bottom hunting to prairie hunting can allow you to spread the envelope if you choose.  Might be why I find myself going into each new hunting season with a new rifle and load for the occasion.  I just like fiddle farting with different things.  How the .270 and .307 worked their way into this whole thing I've no idea    .  Take care.  >>  korey
Back to Top
NH_Hunter View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
aka The Kid

Joined: 13 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 3508
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2003 at 11:32

I can understand the .307,because it is rare. The .277 cal i can understand because you said the stock was beautiful on a tomato stake rifle. The aught six you own i can understand because it was a relative's rifle. You should post a pic of that .277 caliber and the aught six, i want to see pics of them

NH_Hunter

Back to Top
Rob1 View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
** The Walnut Whisperer **

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: Vatican City State
Status: Offline
Points: 3413
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2003 at 11:55
Perhaps the next "in" thing in hunting will be short range with very light cartridges. This would require good stalking skills,patience and marksmanship. Maybe it already exits.
Back to Top
sluggo View Drop Down
.30/06 SpringField
.30/06 SpringField
Avatar

Joined: 11 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 300
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2003 at 12:07

Howdy Gents:

Would you use a .250 Savage on a white tail?

The problem with the rat race is, even if you win, you are still a rat.
Back to Top
TasunkaWitko View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
aka The Gipper

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: Chinook Montana
Status: Offline
Points: 14753
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2003 at 13:51
Originally posted by sluggo sluggo wrote:

Howdy Gents:

Would you use a .250 Savage on a white tail?

absolutely - that rifle was MADE for whitetail, i think!

TasunkaWitko - Chinook, Montana

Helfen, Wehren, Heilen
Die Wahrheit wird euch frei machen
Back to Top
Lawdog View Drop Down
.30/06 SpringField
.30/06 SpringField
Avatar

Joined: 14 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 278
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2003 at 14:00

 

Montana. Home of the Mule deer and some very nice Whitetails. Large deer. Minimum would be 6mm like the .243 Winchester. If you wouldn't use it on a bear then why use it on deer. Would any sane person use a .223, .22-250 or a .220 Swift to follow up a wounded Black Bear into the brush. Many years ago when I was young and stupid I tried the .220 Swift. I shot a nice 3x3 Blacktailed buck at about 150 yards, three times. All of my shots went right where I aimed them, heart/lung area. Thankfully my best friend was there to stop the buck with his .270. I know someone is going to ask what load I was using, it was the heaviest factory bullet/load available at the time from Winchester/Western. I believe it was a 57 grain PSP. It was the load that everyone said to use. Accurate yes but didn’t work on deer. My father tried them with the same results. Like I said a 6mm at the very least in fact I agree with the .257 caliber(.250 Savage) the smallest. Lawdog

 

Back to Top
Low Wall View Drop Down
.22 LongRifle
.22 LongRifle


Joined: 20 June 2003
Status: Offline
Points: 20
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2003 at 14:33
So much for the land of the free with many you limiting use of which guns should be used because personal beliefs or experience. I agree about 22 rf.and many of the 22 cf. Want to be able experiment in the same way many of you have. Would want to try 22-250 on deer if I ever own one. Certainly a 243 would work for deer even if I perfer a bigger gun.. The one I really don't care for is buckshot. Mostly it boils down where the shot is placed.
Back to Top
bcboy View Drop Down
.243 Winchester
.243 Winchester
Avatar

Joined: 12 June 2003
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 169
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2003 at 16:06

 

  25-06 ....no experience myself but ...its a cal. I reckon is mighty underlooked.

  And then go buy a nice 270..

 

  bcboy

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.118 seconds.