The BaitShop Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > FireArms, et cetera > Metallic Cartridge Handloading and Bullet Casting
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Barnes X Bullet Comments for 338 Win Mag.
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

This site is completely supported by donations; there are no corporate sponsors. We would be honoured if you would consider a small donation, to be used exclusively for forum expenses.



Thank you, from the BaitShop Boyz!

Barnes X Bullet Comments for 338 Win Mag.

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
gary murray View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar

Joined: 13 February 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1603
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gary murray Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Barnes X Bullet Comments for 338 Win Mag.
    Posted: 16 April 2012 at 04:38
I bought a box of 225gr Barnes X bullets to reload for my 338 Win Mag at the gun show yesterday. They were only $30.00 for a box of 50. What can you tell me about them? The only concern i have is that they seem a little longer than the other bullets i reloaded. If i seat them to my 225gr O.A.L. which is 3.340, they will sit a little further into my casing. Is this a problem?
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 April 2012 at 05:14

x-bullets are copper so they are less dense than lead jacketed bullets.  They must be seated lower to get them to feed properly in you magazine.  No problems if you single shot.  Because they must be seated deeper they also cut into the powder capacity of most cartridges. IIRC Barnes also says they are 'slippery' so they need more powder to equal the velocity of harder jacketed bullets.

They are a mono construction, and they are deep penetrating. they act as FMJ, although they can have some slits cut into them to promote expansion. 

For game like deer and other small thin skinned game, they  are not the best.  For large bears and moose, big elk, and cape buffalo, they are satisfactory.

I've used them and found them generally non-satisfactory for hunting the lower 48.  But Barnes advertises  tremendously, so the gun writers keep giving great reviews, and many people have bought into them.  Because they are solid, they are cheap to make, but sold at a large premium.  that is where the money comes from for all the ads and gun writer trips.

Remember not only are they expensive per box, but you are only getting 50 of them!!

Last thoughts, they are pure copper (not like jacketed bullets harder materials) so you will get a build up of copper in your barrel, so be sure to clean often and you might need to get a heavy copper cutting bore cleaner.

ON the bright side, they are legal in California and other places that have outlawed regular bullets that have lead.

Back to Top
RobertMT View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar

Joined: 12 March 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4413
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote RobertMT Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 April 2012 at 06:59

Be sure to use a load worked up for Barnes bullets, do not use reg bullet data, it could be over-pressure.  Barnes website has some loads and if you e-mail them with load request, I understand they are quick to respond.

I've looked into them and have not used them, some swear by them and some don't.  I just couldn't see the need to pay the extra.

Want to stop Drunk Drivers, from Killing Sober Drivers? Ban Sober Drivers from Driving. That's how Gun Control Works.

NRA Benefactor Life, GOA Patriot, SAF   

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 April 2012 at 07:16
I've reloaded them in a few cartridges, mostly the 340 Polar for Africa use by my bro'.  Couldn't get them to shoot well as Remington bulk bullets in the 225 grains.
Back to Top
gary murray View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar

Joined: 13 February 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1603
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gary murray Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 April 2012 at 07:30
I may invest in Barnes TSX at another gun show this weekend. I hear good things about them.
Back to Top
MtElkHunter View Drop Down
.375 Holland & Holland Magnum
.375 Holland & Holland Magnum
Avatar

Joined: 10 August 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 587
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MtElkHunter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 April 2012 at 08:02
I have used barnes X bullets in several guns and have
found that my guns love them or hate them. Some of my
guns shoot the best groups i have shot with barnes and
other you might has well use a shotgun. There does not
appear to be any middle ground. I have shot quite a few
animals with X bullets have have seen the following
results. If the gun is shooting normal speeds (2500 to
2900) they work just ok, not great but they get the job
done, with the biggest problem being under expansion. If
you are using a hot rod gun or lighter weight bullets
where the speed is 3000 or more they do much better. The
faster you can drive them the better. The best
performance I have ever got from a X was in my 7mm STW. I
n that gun I was driving a 140 gr barnes X close to 3400
FPS and it shot great and killed everything it hit. I
have some 250 grain barnes X bullets for my 338 that I
have not tried yet but if they will shoot they might be
an interesting combination.
SW Montana
Back to Top
d4570 View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar

Joined: 27 January 2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 9961
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote d4570 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 April 2012 at 08:15

I've used 300 gr and 250 gr for years in my 45/70. They are VERY accurate. The sane gr the barns are almost twice as long making for a Long barring surface in the tube. I can get the 250's up to 30/06 speed ( 2600 fps)out of the marlin making for a much flatter shooter. We use them for coyote ( fur friendly) in the 22's. In the savage 243 there Lazar beams. All the rest too, my boy is loading his CZ 375 H&H with too for our bear thing...

 They have there purpose but you HAVE to find "THE" load for them.



Edited by d4570
Remember: Four boxes keep us free ,the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, AND the cartridge box
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 April 2012 at 08:53
"...biggest problem being under expansion..."  which is the original design.
Back to Top
CB900F View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
Honor, Integrity

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: Eritrea
Status: Offline
Points: 8857
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote CB900F Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 April 2012 at 15:50

Gary;

I agree with Bear.  Particularly on the price/value ratio - I think it sucks.  And notice what Mt. Elk is saying about velocity.  The .338 is not a speed demon & was never meant to be one.  Trying to push it into being one is a recipe for disaster.

Try the 215 gr Sierra.

900F

Birth certificate!? He don't need no steenkink birth certificate!!
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 April 2012 at 01:56
NOt that I'm against x-barnes bullets.  but on long range, they drift considerably more than jacketed lead bullets.  Why, they are less dense than lead so a 225 grain  x-bullet is longer and has more side area than a jacketed bullet.  that means that the bullet is pushed sidewayby cross-winds more than its smaller 225 jacketed bullet.
Back to Top
gary murray View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar

Joined: 13 February 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1603
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gary murray Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 April 2012 at 03:10
I've always been good at putting game on the ground but since i got into reloading last month, i'm starting to get a better understanding of how all things fit together with ammo. At the gun show on Saturday i bought a DVD by Barnes Bullets called "Barnes Bullet Myths Busted". They try to explain away all these misconceptions about what problems Barnes bullets apparently have. Such as, not expanding fast enough on thin skinned animals, excessive copper fouling etc. It was an interesting video but on the other hand i don't expect the Barnes company to admit that some of their bullets have drawbacks. I'm learning quite a bit from hearing what everyone here has to say when they comment about it especially from those that shoot and have shot the 338 Win Mag.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 April 2012 at 03:54

I have that video.  Interesting.  But these are not really myths.  they are just some of the 'downsides' or negatives about a product.

There are positives also, but each person must ask if the negatives are offset by the positives.

The deep penetrating bullets that I use for Africa and brown/grizzly bears are jacket bullet with a internal stainless steel jacket then a center core of lead.  these have the weight of lead and are totally non-distorting in flesh.

BUT if I wanted a deep penetrating bullet with some expansion, the x bullet would be a fair consideration.  The copper bore fouling will always be a stumbling point on X-bullets for me.

While it is never talked about, the Barnes company did not invent pure copper bullets.  the French used them many years ago, but stopped for all the negative reasons  mentioned earlier.  They reentered the market because of the fear of future "banning" of lead for hunting.  Sort of thinking ahead to a Federal issue like the ban on lead shot in shotgunning.

As you mentioned earlier the copper bullets are longer for weight; so it you shoot 250 grain bullets, expect the powder capacity to be cut even further than with the 225 grain bullets.

The 338 is certainly a great medium bore rifle, and the most popular with good reason.  While the 225 grain bullet is probably the best all-round choice; I mainly shoot the 200 grainer.  Maybe because i use it al lot on deer and black bears hunting, and because I have heavier rifles.  But I must say I have great confidence in the 200 grainer and would not think twice on shooting a mountain grizzly with it.  If I waas going specifically for mountain grizzlies with the 338 then I'd probably pick the 250 grain bullet.

Shooting/hunting grizzly/browns is for most folks a once in a lifetime thing, so I like to use enough gun/bullet.  But if butchering an elk and a griz comes in, the 338 with 200-250 would not find me wanting. 

 

Back to Top
gary murray View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar

Joined: 13 February 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1603
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gary murray Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 April 2012 at 04:39
I keep being told that for grizzly i need a heavy bullet like 225gr and up. I never thought i could use a 200gr or a 210gr. We have two types of grizzly here too. We have the interior grizzly and the coastal grizzly. I believe the coastal grizzly is the biggest of the two. I just want to pick the right bullet for the job and i owe it to the bear to do so. I'm not interested in higher speed velocities like CB had mentioned and i'm not interested in castrating flies at a 100 yards. I just want a nice group at a 100 yards around 1 or 1.5 inches.

Edited by gary murray
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 April 2012 at 05:11

Coastal grizzlies are bigger, often called Brown bears, but are still just grizzlies that have fed on fish and got bigger.  Interior grizzlies can be lighter in weight than large black bears.  What bears are you hunting?  are they your game target?

A lot of people think that the 300 win mag and the 7 mm mag (and even the 30-06) are good bear guns, and I'd certainly not say they were 'bad' bear guns.  But these same weapons don't shoot a bullet over 200 grains.  Yes the section density is greater in a 200 grain 30-06 than in a 200 grain 338 win mag. 

again, there are two considerations: are you hunting griz/browns?  Or are you hunting other game and are concerned about a nuisance grizzly coming up when you are butchering an elk?

If you are hunting grizzly/browns, then I'd reload for that animal...and a bigger bullet is always better.  And if you can handle the recoil, I'd opt for a 250 grainer in the 338 mag (there is a 300 grainer available).  But if I was hunting elk/deer, I'd pick the best bullet for that game.

Bigger isn't better if the individual doesn't shoot it as well as a lighter bullet.  The most important element in the effective kill is bullet placement...not the size or type of bullet.    So if you shoot the 200 grain bullet better than a 250 grainer then I'd opt for the lighter bullet. 

Personally, I think the 338 is a little light for hunting coastal griz/brown bears...especially as often these bears are in thicker cover.  Interior bears can be in some thick berry cover also.  Bears look like they move slow when you watch them grazing  or walking around...but they are very fast animals when they are running mad. 

 IMO the 458 is not overkill in a brown bear rifle...which takes the heavier weight bullet best.

Your criteria of 1-1.5 inch groups is very reasonable, and can be achieved with 200-225- 250 grain bullets.

Are you hunting grizzlies or just concerned about incidental contact situation?

 

Back to Top
Igbo Foo View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
.14 Flea

Joined: 15 August 2003
Status: Offline
Points: 567
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Igbo Foo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 April 2012 at 05:18

There's another thing to consider with reloading the Barnes bullets: Because they're longer, and therefore seat deeper, yes the powder capacity is reduced. But also, when you get into compressed loads, even though they're not at maximum case volume, you can easily overpressure.  Many loads depend on some few cc's of unused case volume to allow gas expansion without spiking the pressure.  Be very careful reloading the Barnes bullets.  Use only established loads and do not substitute anything on the initial loads. 

Foo

Wombat Snorgging: Australia's mystery perversion, Elvis's secret shame.
Back to Top
gary murray View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar

Joined: 13 February 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1603
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gary murray Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 April 2012 at 07:34
Originally posted by Igbo Foo Igbo Foo wrote:

There's another thing to consider with reloading the Barnes bullets: Because they're longer, and therefore seat deeper, yes the powder capacity is reduced. But also, when you get into compressed loads, even though they're not at maximum case volume, you can easily overpressure.  Many loads depend on some few cc's of unused case volume to allow gas expansion without spiking the pressure.  Be very careful reloading the Barnes bullets.  Use only established loads and do not substitute anything on the initial loads. 

Foo



I downloaded a Barnes load data table for my caliber off their web site as i heard you can't use your conventional load data for a Barnes bullet.


Edited by gary murray
Back to Top
gary murray View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar

Joined: 13 February 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1603
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gary murray Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 April 2012 at 07:38
Bear. As you know i got a grizzly draw this year so i'm trying to find the right bullet for this hunt only. For elk, deer, moose etc i will switch to something a little lighter later on towards the fall.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 April 2012 at 08:01

Well, that 225 x-bullet might be just the ticket for a dedicated bear hunt; especially if your are shooting open hillsides.  Certainly you could go to a 250 gr...if the additional recoil doesn't bother you.

Accuracy means everything, heart shots put grizzlies down immediately.  they will thrash around on the ground,   but usually will not get up.  I guess when you are at the top of the food chain you can be a sissy!!Wink

If I was hunting thickets, the heavier bullet the better, and never go into a berry thicket ALONE.  Bears generally run away when spooked.   But they are dumb.... so away usually means, anyway they want to go; including right across YOU.

Remember your backup, if he has to shoot to get a bear off you should immediately go to the kneeling position so there is less likelihood of shooting thru the bear and hitting you.  This is the same technique used for shooting lion, leopard, and other dangerous game off a mauled victim.  My 416 shoots thru most things, so I've had to learn how to protect my partner.

I assume you are only allowed to shoot males?  While they maybe only have a 350-500# body weight, their claws are the same size as a 900# coastal bear.

Back to Top
MtElkHunter View Drop Down
.375 Holland & Holland Magnum
.375 Holland & Holland Magnum
Avatar

Joined: 10 August 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 587
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MtElkHunter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 April 2012 at 08:02
As I stated in previous posts my standard load for my 338
is 250 grain partition bullets. Over the last 40 years I
have tried a bunch of different combinations loads for a
bunch of different guns and I find that I have better
luck with the heavy for caliber bullets in just about any
gun. Not that they are more accurate but they perform
better and more consistently on game. I have had some
strange things happen with real light fast bullets on
game. If everything works right a light fast bullet kills
very fast as in dead in their tracks fast, however, I
have also had them make some strange turns, tumble and
fragment. Heavy bullets can still do these things but it
appears to me to be lots less often. I have taken a
number of animals with the 250 and it so far has always
put a 2 inch hole in a straight line completely thru the
animal. If I was going after a one in a lifetime bear
there is no question I would be using a good quality 250
grain.

If I thought I could send you a few partitions without
getting into customs issues I would and you could try
them out.         &n bsp;
SW Montana
Back to Top
gary murray View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar

Joined: 13 February 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 1603
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote gary murray Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 April 2012 at 08:12
Thanx MtEH.
I have been taking everything into account what you have been saying so no, it hasn't fallen on deaf ears. I only started reloading last month so i have yet to find the right load for my gun and that's why i'm posting a lot lately about my caliber and the bullets i bought. I may pick up some Partitons or TSX's at the gun show this weekend. My grizzly hunt will be the May long weekend and i want to have a load ready by then.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.147 seconds.