The BaitShop Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > FireArms, et cetera > Handguns, Pistols and SixGuns
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - 380 Fad Ammo
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

This site is completely supported by donations; there are no corporate sponsors. We would be honoured if you would consider a small donation, to be used exclusively for forum expenses.



Thank you, from the BaitShop Boyz!

380 Fad Ammo

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Muleskinner View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
AKA The Crotchety ol’ Geezer

Joined: 13 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5285
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Muleskinner Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: 380 Fad Ammo
    Posted: 15 November 2010 at 01:01
Way back in the 70s, there was a Death Wish movie (I think) in which a killer used "dumb dumb" bullets in a Walther 380 to wreak terrible havoc on her victims (yes, the killer was a woman vigilante).  Today, you see all manner of hollow point ammo being used for CCW purposes.  I'm telling you, like the movie hype, this is a mistake.  I did a little testing using some old clothing, a wool coat, and phone books.  During the summer it may be a different story, but when there's heavy clothing involved, a 380 user is better off with hot ball ammo, even in a pistol that feeds both reliably.  I'd also avoid bullets under 100 grains.  Penetration is the compromise with this little cartridge, even at short ranges.  While I'm a firm believer in flying saucer ammo for my 45 acp, the 380 is a whole differernt critter.  Not really sure I want to rely on a 380 for self defense at all, but when jock or sock carry is the only option, it has it's place.
Mule
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 November 2010 at 01:34
For years, I've carry a Colt Auto Pocket Pistol a heavy scaled down sort of 1911...but in 32 auto.  While all the gun writers say the silvertip hollow point is the best (and mine feeds they perfectly) for CCW I always use a FMJ in autos and a wad cuter in revolvers.  They give me the best penetration....when I might need it.
Back to Top
Wing master View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
AKA StraightShooter

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8029
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Wing master Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 November 2010 at 05:31

I have heard the term "dumb dumb bullets" before, but have no idea what they are. Could someone enlighten me?

Wing master

I have always considered myself to be quite the bullshitter, But ocasionally it is nice to sit back and listen to a true professional......So, Carry on.
Back to Top
Muleskinner View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
AKA The Crotchety ol’ Geezer

Joined: 13 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5285
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Muleskinner Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 November 2010 at 05:45
Correction - the movie was "Sudden Death," staring Denise Coward and Frank Runyeon.  Wing, I think it's just an old term applied to hollowpoints.

Storyline:  Valarie is a happy, successful career woman, engaged to a charming and handsome man. She drives a great car and lives in a beautiful apartment. Then one night she hails the wrong taxi. She is brutally raped by the two car thieves who were taking a joyride. They leave her on the sidewalk to die after they're done with her. When she recovers, her fiancée abandons her, and with the police unable to help much in tracking down her attackers, Valarie buys a gun and takes to the gritty streets after dark, luring and killing street thugs who accosted her while searching for the two thugs to get her revenge. She becomes known in the press as the 'Dum-Dum Killer' because of the hollow-point bullets she pattens out and uses. At the same time, she begins dating a sympathetic police detective, named Marty, who takes an interest in her rape case, while tracking down the 'Dum-Dum Killer', and when he begins to suspect her, he is torn between upholding the law and protecting his newest love interest.
Mule
Back to Top
Igbo Foo View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
.14 Flea

Joined: 15 August 2003
Status: Offline
Points: 567
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Igbo Foo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 November 2010 at 05:47

Back, back, way back before even Muleskinner was invented, back before hollowpoint, or jacketed, bullets, people would do one of two things to make a dumb-dumb bullet.  1. they would cut the round nose off a lead bullet to cause the nose to have some area of flat meplat.  Or, 2. they'd cut a cross in the nose of the lead bullet.

foo

Wombat Snorgging: Australia's mystery perversion, Elvis's secret shame.
Back to Top
Kingpin View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
aka Old IronSides

Joined: 01 July 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11716
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Kingpin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 November 2010 at 08:17

The term "dum dum" came from India during english imperialism. Ammunition for the brits was manufacturered in Dum Dum Arsenal somewhere in India. I'll research it and incluse a little more if possible......................Kingpin

Here's a little more:

The 'dum-dum' was a British military bullet developed for use in India - at the Dum-Dum Arsenal - on the North West Frontier in the late 1890s.

The dum-dum comprised a jacketed .303 bullet with the jacket nose open to expose its lead core.  The aim was to improve the bullet's effectiveness by increasing its expansion upon impact.

The phrase 'dum-dum' was later taken to include any soft-nosed or hollow pointed bullet.  The Hague Convention of 1899 outlawed the use of dum-dum bullets during warfare.

During the First World War the Belgian government faced German charges of having used dum-dum bullets in battle.  Kaiser Wilhelm II wrote a telegram to U.S. President Woodrow Wilson on 7 September 1914 protesting such use; the Belgians strongly denied the Kaiser's charges.

And yet more:

The term 'dum-dum bullet' is used as slang to describe a variety of bullet types. Unfortunately, there is no 'official' technical definition of a dum-dum, but the purpose, function and history of the bullet can be gleaned from research.

Brief Description

A 'dum dum' bullet is a slang term indicating a type of bullet designed to impart greater stopping power to its target by deforming on impact. There are various means by which a bullet can be designed to do this - hollow point, soft point or soft nose, cross cut. The purpose is the same - to ensure that when the bullet strikes an object, it will flatten or 'mushroom' and hence transfer more kinetic energy to the target material rather than blasting a hole through it. Technically, the true 'dum dum' is a soft-nosed projectile - one in which the metal jacket material of the bullet stops short of the bullet's tip, leaving the soft lead exposed. These bullets are of reduced effectiveness against body armor; since the way modern ballistic armor works is to attempt to spread the force of a bullet's impact rather than allowing it to penetrate, they play to its strengths. They are enormously effective at increasing the lethality of high-velocity, smaller caliber rounds - bullets fired from long ranges, at high speeds, etc. They increase the chance of doing lethal damage with a single hit. Snipers would use them for this reason. Hunters would use them to bring down large game that might otherwise go berserk and run off (or worse, towards the hunter) wounded, if hit with a penetrating projectile. One downside to this is that the deforming lead is more likely to fragment and remain in the target, in small pieces.


History and Origins

What is most well-known about the term is also, actually, usually correct. The name 'dum-dum' is taken from the name of the Dum Dum Arsenal, run by the British Army in the Northeast of India (near Calcutta) in the nineteenth century. In 1888, the British Army adopted the Lee-Metford Mark I rifle - designed by an American, James Paris Lee, with a barrel and rifling system designed by a William E. Metford. The Mark I, I* and II of this weapon were the last black powder weapons used by the British Army, despite their modern features of a vertical box magazine and bolt action. The more powerful smokeless powder (cordite) was waiting in the wings, but would not hit the stage in wide use for a few years yet. This is of direct importance to our story.

In 1895, there was a coup d'etat in the district of Chitral, in what is now northern Pakistan. The British representative was driven from the area, which had been a British agency since 1889. This, naturally, resulted in the dispatch of an expedition from neighboring India consisting of some 16,000 troops, armed with Lee-Metfords. Although their mission was eventually successful, there were several reports that the new weapons had been not entirely satisfactory at stopping charging Chitrali tribesmen. This was due to two factors, apparently; one, the nickel-jacketed bullet used in the new gun tended to blow 'clean holes' in its targets, with little stopping power; and two, the black-powder charge in the new guns meant their muzzle velocity had not yet achieved the levels seen in more modern weapons, with a correspondingly lower kinetic energy imparted to the bullet.

In response to this, a Captain Clay at the Dum Dum Arsenal (which is where ammunition was produced for local consumption by the India station British) looked at modifying the bullets being issued for the Lee-Metford to make up for this performance gap. According to British sources (and Wikipedia), this bullet was not a hollow-point or cross-cut bullet, but a soft point - that is, the metal jacket was deleted from the very front of the projectile, leaving the lead core exposed. As a result, when the bullet struck and penetrated, the exposed lead nose would deform and flatten, transferring energy to the target more quickly. This modification was apparently only produced for local use, and not in very large numbers. The nickname 'dum-dum bullet,' however, was adopted by the local soldiery to mean a bullet modified to impart greater stopping power.

There apparently was some confusion about the meaning of the term even at the time, or perhaps more than one method was tried; a letter posted to the American Army Navy Journal in 1897 (dated November 20) indicates that the bullet is created in the following fashion: "The nickel jacket of the Lee-Metford bullet is ripped up along its length, leaving the head whole. On the impact of the new bullet, the nickel stripe and the lead spread out like a round fan and naturally cause a dreadful wound, and the person hit is immediately knocked down."

Back in England, meanwhile, the Woolwich Arsenal had been developing a hollow point bullet for the .303 Lee-Metford. This bullet was dubbed the Mark III, and adopted in 1897 - around the same time as the 'dum-dum' became available, but entirely separately, and not due to feedback from the Indian theater. It was not used very long, however, and the Mark IV and Mark V followed quickly due to design flaws, with the Mark V .303 hollow point bullet becoming standard in 1899. This may be the source of some of the confusion between hollow points and dum-dums.


Legal Ramifications

The use of deforming projectiles in warfare has been a hotly-contested practice. One of the first attempts to address their use in war came almost immediately after the results of said use had been seen. At The Hague Convention of 1899, a convention was proposed and enacted in the spirit of the Declaration of St. Petersburg (1868). This new convention read, in part:

The Contracting Parties agree to abstain from the use of bullets which expand or flatten easily in the human body, such as bullets with a hard envelope which does not entirely cover the core, or is pierced with incisions.

The present Declaration is only binding for the Contracting Powers in the case of a war between two or more of them.

It shall cease to be binding from the time when, in a war between the Contracting Parties, one of the belligerents is joined by a non-Contracting Power.

Note that the United States was not a signatory to this document. However, the U.S. did sign on to The Hague Convention of 1907. Article 23 of that document states that "In addition to the prohibitions provided by special Conventions, it is especially forbidden -...To employ arms, projectiles, or material calculated to cause unnecessary suffering." This depends on whether the use of the dum-dum is 'calculated to cause unnecessary suffering.' Note that originally, it had nothing to do with suffering and everything to do with effectiveness; it could be argued that the much higher lethality of the dum-dum might involve less suffering than the wounds caused by FMJ rounds. However, on such fine points are great drunken arguments and international incidents made. Kaiser Wilhelm wrote President Woodrow Wilson a blistering note regarding the reported use of dum-dum bullets by the Belgian forces during the German invasion of their country in 1914, which the Belgians denied. So the degree to which this prohibition exists beyond its use as a diplomatic lever is uncertain.

It should be noted that, for the most part, modern militaries do, in fact, use fully jacketed bullets. This is not true in all cases, however. For example, in 1985, the U.S. Judge Advocate General issued an opinion which specifically stated that the use of a particular type of bullet (Sierra #2200 'Match King') by snipers, which had an open tip (soft nose), was not in contravention to the Laws of War because the open tip was used to increase accuracy rather than increase suffering or bullet effects, and that comparison of the effects of these bullets to jacketed bullets showed a negligible variation. In addition, since the U.S. has generally considered itself bound by the 1899 document despite not being a formal signatory, it is probably with some sense of delicious irony that an oft-mentioned (but not seen by this author) 1990 document (also purportedly from the JAG, and the same authors therein of the 1985 memo) concluded that in counterterrorist operations, open-tipped bullets were A-OK since the opposing forces were definitely of a 'non-contracting Power.'



Edited by Kingpin
There are times when a normal man must, spit in his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
Back to Top
RobertMT View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar

Joined: 12 March 2008
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4413
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote RobertMT Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 November 2010 at 11:13

I did some testing last two years, I didn't use clothes though, I used deer.  Unlike testing the 45acp, 38sp and 357mag, I didn't use live deer, I didn't feel the 380 was lethal enough to be ethical.  On head shots on dead deer the ball would reliably penetrate the skull from 30ft, hp would penetrate from temple, but not from front.  On ribcage ball would break off side rib, but not fully penetrate, hp made it to offside, but didn't break rib, internal damage was higher though, more bloodshot and lung damage.  I didn't dress the deer in coat first, but in colder weather, I can carry something bigger than 380 anyway.

On live deer, they were WT does except for one buck, they were all shot at, between 18yds and 30 yds.

On the 45acp 5" barrel, I had best results with hp bullets, ball didn't have as much bloodshot and only slightly better penetration. 240 lswc preformed better than ball, not as much expansion as hp.

On 38 out of a snub revolver 2" barrel, 158gr lrn gave best results, hp didn't penetrate as well and didn't have enough velocity to expand much either.  158 lswc didn't expand much, penetration was more than hp, less than lrn.

On 357 6" barrel, both the 38sp and 357, hp had enough velocity to preform well.  The 158 lrn over-penetrated, the 158 lswc was a close second to hp.

While this is not a large enough sample to be scientifically valid and deer are only a rough correlation, I carry 158 lrn, alternated with 158 lswc, in 38 snub; 158 hp, alternated with 158 lrn in 357mag in 357 6" barrel, 200gr xtp in 45 and 90gr xtp, alternated with 95gr ball in 380.

The 45 doesn't shoot ball or lswc to same POI or I would alternate one of those in mag also.  I feel this covers the most effective use of each round, "for my uses" and is the most effective compromise on each, "for my uses".  I carry as heavy as each  situation allows and would say 38 snub is most often carried, 45 second, then the 380.  I feel the 380 is better than nothing and could be quite lethal at close range, it's better as a second chance, than primary defense.

Want to stop Drunk Drivers, from Killing Sober Drivers? Ban Sober Drivers from Driving. That's how Gun Control Works.

NRA Benefactor Life, GOA Patriot, SAF   

Back to Top
Muleskinner View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
AKA The Crotchety ol’ Geezer

Joined: 13 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 5285
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Muleskinner Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 November 2010 at 13:00
Man, I really feel prepared to answer anyone's future question about dum-dum bullets.  Unfortunately, my memory being what it is, I'll probably forget and need to go through this all over again in a few years.  Stay tuned.
Mule
Back to Top
Wing master View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
AKA StraightShooter

Joined: 10 June 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8029
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Wing master Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 November 2010 at 17:42

Thanks for all the info on dum dum bullets.

This place is a wealth of information on any subject.

Wing master

I have always considered myself to be quite the bullshitter, But ocasionally it is nice to sit back and listen to a true professional......So, Carry on.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 November 2010 at 01:26

I believe the criminal street use of the bullet and term "Dum-Dum" is a Cross-cut bullet, cut fully to the case mouth.  The intented use is not to expand, but to fragment into four pieces on impact; therby making removal and surgical repair difficult if not impossible.  Secondary considerationsa are: it frags so that no bullet comparison can be made and it causes more suffering.  It is often used between opposing gang members and toward LEO.

 

Back to Top
Dennis Keith View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar

Joined: 09 September 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1468
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dennis Keith Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 November 2010 at 02:25
I wonder if the bullets currently in use that tumble and break up after hitting a target could be said to fall into that restricted class of ammunition banned by the major treaties. That Russian 5.45 round even has a hollow tip to improve "efficiency" against human sized targets. However since we are not engaged by armies, rather we face a ragtag bunch of terrorists I guess the point mat after all be moot.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 November 2010 at 02:44

My understanding is the 5.56 mm round was picked be cause it tumblen and was devasting when shooting watermelons and pumpkins.  Later some one figured it out and made legal rounds after the Generals had been "impressed" by the tumblers.

One of the expressed values of the long non-lead military 5.56 round (aka Green round) is it tumbles in flesh.  I posted this earlier as I think it is in violation of the convention.

Back to Top
Kingpin View Drop Down
.416 Rigby
.416 Rigby
Avatar
aka Old IronSides

Joined: 01 July 2003
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 11716
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Kingpin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 November 2010 at 15:35
Actually, the 5.56 bullet rotates at around 180,000 rpm's at 3,250 fps. When it strikes a body, still rotating at that speed, it goes into a "yaw." This means that it "noses" up and still spins as it, instead of drills, it hacks it's way, through the target. As it travels, should it strike a bone, it fragments violently. When shot through a 20% solution of ballistic gelitain with a cow hip bone in it, you will find that the bullet fragments gathered up weigh about 55% less than the bullet originally weighed before being fired. I suppose the yawing could be construed as "tumbling," but it's not looked at as such in labs. In the gulf war, wounded troops averaged 9 perforations per troop. This could be attributed to fragmentary grenades and the like, but at least SOME of it is dependant on high velocity projectiles.................Kingpin
There are times when a normal man must, spit in his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.153 seconds.