Thank you, from the BaitShop Boyz! |
head vs heart/lung shots |
Post Reply |
Author | |
BEAR
Administrator Joined: 07 September 2013 Location: Appalachian Mtn Status: Offline Points: 13734 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 10 November 2015 at 04:48 |
When I started hunting whitetails 50+ years ago, I was advised that heart/lung shots were the best. So that is what I've been doing since, and recommending.
Deer usually last 10-15 seconds and can go some distance running wide open. But I was young and enjoyed short tracking, many times I could see them bleed out and go down. Nothing wrong with this shot. I used heart/lung shots for everything from fox to boar to cape buffalo. But I'm a little older now and starting with boar have been using head shots. Dead Right There! No drag, no swamp retrievals, etc My eyes and arms are not as good as when I was 20 years old, so Im probably not as good shooting as when younger. But my patience for a perfect shot is much greater. What are your feelings on head shots vs heart/lung shots for non dangerous big game. |
|
d4570
.416 Rigby Joined: 27 January 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 9403 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I always try to do a behind the shoulder shot. there is a lot of empty space in a head shot that only dicks up a deer and they starve to death.
If there looking straight at me I'll center punch the chest. If there running dead away I shoot a high tail shot , not pretty but there down and I can finish them off as fast as I can. AKA Texas heart shot... |
|
Remember: Four boxes keep us free ,the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, AND the cartridge box
|
|
TasunkaWitko
Administrator aka The Gipper Joined: 10 June 2003 Location: Chinook Montana Status: Offline Points: 14749 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
For me, it is heart/lung all the way - except for the couple of times that I was successful with a head shot, because they were the only shots I had. I would never seek it out as the first option, personally.
|
|
TasunkaWitko - Chinook, Montana
Helfen, Wehren, Heilen Die Wahrheit wird euch frei machen |
|
MtElkHunter
.375 Holland & Holland Magnum Joined: 10 August 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 587 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I use head and neck shots if presented with it and all the conditions are good. If anything is not right I will go for the heart/lung shot. I have taken quite a bit of game with head/neck shots and it works very well. I can only think of one time I wounded a deer with a head shot and required a follow up shot and that one I was outside of my comfortable shot range. There really is nothing like a well executed head/neck shot and watching the animal literally go straight down that you actually see the legs tuck up before the body hits the ground.
|
|
SW Montana
|
|
VarmintGuy
.243 Winchester Joined: 04 June 2006 Status: Offline Points: 131 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Bear & MtElkHunter: I have harvested far in excess of 200
head of Big Game myself and been "in on" (standing with and spotting for the Big Game shooter) the harvest of several hundred more. This includes Moose, Roosevelt Elk, Rocky Mountain Elk, Blacktail Deer, Mule Deer, Whitetailed Deer, Black Bear, Antelope and Mt. Goats! Over the past 56 years of harvesting I have learned these two undeniable facts - Game animals shot through the heart/lungs "die" quicker (within about 6 seconds or sooner!) AND more reliably than head/neck shot Game animals AND the flesh/meat/organs of heart/lung shot Game animals tastes MUCH better than head/neck/spine shot Game animals! The simple facts are Game animals shot through the heart/lungs pump "out" most all of their blood is gone from their flesh and their flesh is thus rendered much more palatable! This is the SAME principle as cattle and hogs being professionally slaughtered/bled out - that flesh is much more palatable than that of cattle and hogs who are home slaughtered with a 22 shot to the head and they are not bled quickly and properly - and I have partaken of such beef and pork so I know from experience here also! AND... the PROPER heart/lung "target" area on game animals is MUCH larger than the head/neck "kill zone"! Sadly it seems each year I see Elk and Deer with their jaws shot off or a large blood splotch on their necks - and one year I became aware of a Cow Moose not far from my house that sadly had her jaw shot off! Needless suffering, these type neck/jaw shots often cause! Thats why I always (and I always have!) waited for and insisted upon heart/lung shots on Big Game. I have NEVER Hunted twice with anyone who professes or attempts head/neck shots on Game animals - period! Those that wish to try and head/neck shoot Game animals are free to do so just NOT from MY camps and they must then endure less palatable game meat if said animal is brought to bag. Go with the much larger, BETTER and more sportsmanlike heart/lung shots - it was the technique I was taught and that I have taught and it has served me exceptionally well for way more than half a century now. Good luck to all this season. Hold into the wind VarmintGuy |
|
samchap
.416 Rigby Honor, Integrity Joined: 12 August 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1781 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
VarmintGuy, I believe in what you so nicely expressed. The
H-L shot has always worked for me and I taught my "boys" to use it and they agree on the logic of it. That and never taking a poor shot. Well put. |
|
samchap - Waldoboro, ME
Be careful what you decide to not like. Your wife may wear one. Your son may ride one. Your daughter may bring one home. You may have to have one someday. |
|
MtElkHunter
.375 Holland & Holland Magnum Joined: 10 August 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 587 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
VG First off let me say that the argument is really a moot point because 95% of the time I use the H-L shot because the correct opportunity for a H-N shot is not present. With that said I will respectfully disagree with your logic. A H-N shot with a reasonable caliber (not a 22) creates an instant kill and creates a massive wound that bleeds the animal very well. Because a H-N shot disrupts the CNS an animal's heart will continue to pump blood until bled out. It really is no different than an cow in a slaughter house where they use a pneumatic hammer to the brain and then cut the jugular vein.
I do agree that the shot placement is much more precise but a miss is a miss and an animal shot in the gut from a muffed H-L shot is suffering as much as a muffed H-N shot. I too have taken many animals over the years and seen much more taken well into the hundreds and I have seen more muffed H-L shots than muffed H-N shots. That is probably because most people do not take the H-N shots. As far as not hunting with someone who does take H-N shots well like you said that is your choice and it is a free country, however, to me that is like saying I am not going to hunt with someone who has wounded a animal, or took a shot when they should not have or someone who hunts from a truck and does not walk, or gun hunters saying archery hunter are bad. It a level of intolerance that is dividing the hunting community and if we are divided we will all fall. there are enough people who are trying to stop hunting that we need to stick together or we are done so I will always support other hunters even if they do not hunt or shoot the way I do. The way I look at it if someone is doing something different than I am maybe they have something to teach me. |
|
SW Montana
|
|
BEAR
Administrator Joined: 07 September 2013 Location: Appalachian Mtn Status: Offline Points: 13734 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Good thoughts MtElkHunter.
Head and neck shots are NOT for the average hunter. Only experienced and accurate shooters should consider anything except a heart/lung shot (bigger target for weaker shooters). Locally, when a hunter hits a deer and can't find it, they end up at my door. Don't know how I became the tracker of lost deer, but it happened. Now I must say I enjoy night tracking with a 1 cell light. In almost every incident over the last 20+ years, these were H_L shots that ended up in the gut. I find the vast majority of these deer. I never even mention "bad shot'. But most are taken when the deer is 'moving away' and the hunter doesn't want to 'miss an opportunity'. |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |